• Lorenz Reilly, Jacob Beck, Sophie Horneber, Florian Keusch, Christopher Antoun (2022): Google Trends as a tool for public opinion research: An illustration of the perceived threats of immigration, pp. 193-206. Cham, Springer

• Keusch Florian (2022): How to distinguish between passive and active mobile data collection, pp. (e-only). Sage

• Silber Henning, Frederic Gerdon, Ruben L. Bach, Christoph Kern, Florian Keusch, Frauke Kreuter (2022): In which situations are people likely to share their health data? A vignette experiment on willingness to donate three different types of health data, [ Frühjahrstagung der Sektion Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie (DGS), (virtual conference), ]

• Yan Ting, Florian Keusch (2022): In Which Direction Do You Think This Scale Should Go? Scale Direction Preference and Its Impact on Survey Responses, [ AAPOR 77th Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, ]

• Keusch Florian, Johanna Mehltretter (2022): A Review of the Use of Google Trends Data in Survey and Public Opinion Research, [ AAPOR 77th Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, ]

• Keusch Florian, Paulina Pankowska, Ruben L. Bach, Alexandru Cernat (2022): Measuring Facebook use: The accuracy of self-reported data versus digital trace data, [ Joint Statistical Meetings 2022, Washington, DC, ]

• Malich Sonja, Georg-Christoph Haas, Florian Keusch, Sebastian Bähr, Frauke Kreuter, Mark Trappmann (2022): Challenges of Measuring Social Interaction with Smartphone App Data, [ General Online Research (GOR 22), Berlin, ]

• Keusch Florian (2022): Do you have two minutes to talk about your data? Data donation as a way of collecting digital traces, [ RSS International Conference 2022, Aberdeen, ]

• Stadtmüller Sven, Henning Silber, Jessica Daikeler, Florian Keusch (2022): The role of heuristics in processing survey results: Evidence from a vignette experiment, [ WAPOR 75th Annual Conference, Dubai, ]

• Gschwend Thomas, Klara Müller, Simon Munzert, Marcel Neunhoeffer, Lukas Stoetzer (2022): The Zweitstimme Model: A Dynamic Forecast of the 2021 German Federal Election, PS: Political Science and Politics, 55, 1, pp. 85-90.

• Heyne Stefanie, Tobias Wolbring (2022): Do Mothers and Fathers in Germany Really Prefer a Traditional Division of Labor? The Impact of Working Hours on Life Satisfaction Reconsidered, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 51, 3, pp. 298-306.

• Kleinewiese Julia (2022): The Darkfield of Cybercrime: Can Survey Data Reduce Administrative Data’s Problem with Validity?, International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 16, 1, pp. 141–155.

• Cheng Cindy, Amélie Desvars-Larrive, Bernhard Ebbinghaus, Thomas Hale, Alexandra Howes, Lukas Lehner, Luca Messerschmidt, Angeliki Nika, Steve Penson, Anna Petherick, Hanmeng Xu, Alexander Zapf, Yuxi Zhang, Sophia Zweig (2022): Capturing the COVID-19 Crisis through Public Health and Social Measures Data Science, Scientific Data, 9, pp. (article no. 520), pp. 1-9.

• Paunov Yavor, Tobias Vogel, Moritz Ingendahl, Michaela Wänke (2022): Transparent by choice: Proactive disclosures increase compliance with digital defaults, Frontiers in Psychology , 13, pp. (article no 981497), pp. 1-8.

• Ingendahl Moritz, Tobias Vogel, Michaela Wänke (2022): The articulatory in-out effect: Driven by articulation fluency?, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 99, pp. (article no 104273), pp. 1-7.

• Herwig Ira E., Jutta Mata, Philipp Kadel (2022): Eine Umfrage zur Unter­stützung eines stärker pflanzen­basierten Angebotes in einer Universitäts-Mensa – Ein Praxisbericht, Umweltpsychologie, 25, 2, pp. 63-81.

• Areal João (2022): ‘Them’ without ‘us’: negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil, Political Research Exchange, 4, 1, pp. (article no. 2117635) pp.1-25.

• Asendorpf Jens B., Jochen E. Gebauer (2022): Good intensions - unfortunate side effects: commentaries to Leising et al., Personality Science, 3, pp. (article no. e9227), p. 5-7.

• Dorison Charles, Jennifer Lerner, Blake Heller, et al. (2022): In COVID-19 health messaging, loss framing increases anxiety with little-to-no concomitant benefits: Experimental evidence from 84 countries, Affective Science, 3, pp. 577–602.

• Massey (ed.) Douglas, Jana Berkessel (2022): A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, 22, pp. (article no. e2111091119).

• Behrens Lion, Dominic Nyhuis, Thomas Gschwend (2022): Constructive and destructive legislative review: The government-opposition divide in parliamentary oversight, The Journal of Politics, 85, 1, pp. 223-239.

• König Thomas, Guido Ropers (2022): How Gendered Is the Peer-Review Process? A Mixed-Design Analysis of Reviewer Feedback, PS: Political Science & Politics, 55, 1, pp. 135-141.

• König Thomas, Nick Lin, Xiao Lu, Thiago N. Silva, Nikoleta Yordanova, Galina Zudenkova (2022): Agenda Control and Timing of Bill Initiation: A Temporal Perspective on Coalition Governance in Parliamentary Democracies, American Political Science Review, 116, 1, pp. 231 - 248.

• Höhne Jan Karem, Christoph Kern, Konstantin Gavras, Stephan Schlosser (2022): The Sound of Respondents: Predicting Respondents’ Level of Interest with Voice Data in Smartphone Surveys, pp. 21. Rochester, NY, SSRN

• Gavras Konstantin (2022): The Conditions and Nature of Europeanized Public Discourse, Mannheim, University of Mannheim